Rajaram Ramachandran Poems

(Aravana Adigal told Manimegalai that
he knew Pugar's end and that he came
with her mother to Kanchi specially for
her. She prostrated before him and
...

(The light of knowledge Aravana Adigal
showed to Manimegalai to realize the
ultimate truth. She heard in the role of
a sage and vowed in her mind to snap
...

The ten truths will measure the quality of things. They are (1) Ksatchi (Perception) , (2) Karudal (Inference) , (3) Uvamam (Comparison) , (4) Aagamam (Scriptures) , (5) Arundapathi (Associated idea) (6) Iyalbu (Natural) , (7) Ideegam (Tradition) , (8) Abhavam (Non-existent) , (9) Meetchiyal Ariym Ozhivarrivu (Elimination) , (10) Thondri Ulladhagum Sambavam (Incident) .

(1) Perception
...

Clear with no investigation means to say that it a "Man" boldly, when it is a narrow necked vessel lying on a horse ground.

(5) Seen but not felt
...

A person endowed with divine eyes, they can see and feel individual atoms separately. Others cannot see the existence of these atoms in the crowd of bodies. These atoms will be visible to their eyes like one thick lock of hairs on the head after the sunset.

(6) Seven kinds of colors
...

From the gross mind source, the intelligence called "Maann" is born. From that intelligence space principle is born. From space, air principle is born. From air, fire principle is born. From fire, water principle is born. From water, the land principle is born. From this crowd, "Manam" is born.

(c) Material changes and property
...

Aravana Adigal told Manimegala about other religions.

(a) Two measures
"Oh maiden, listen carefully. Lord Buddha brought two measures- first the perfect perception and the second perfect opinion."
...

(a) The perception fault
These imitations are considered false. In these, the perception fault will say against the known and seen vision. ‘The ear will not feel the sound"—it says what is opposite, like this.

(b) Inference fault
...

Keep the non-existent at one side, and find another side for the existent to suit everything equally. ‘Sound will appear in the workplace, because it is impermanent'—the impermanency reason to appear in the workplace, it looks like for the sky and lightning, both non-existent; it suits the lightning, but not the sky. It will appear as the existent things like pot will suit at every place, which is a false appearance. It gives room for doubts, ‘Like lightning appears in workplace non-permanently? ' or ‘Like pot appears in workplace non-permanently? '

(b-5) Contributory side expansion
The said reason supports both existent and non-existent, each one supporting one side. ‘Sound is permanent'—this is an existent statement, ‘Because it has no shape.' Here the ‘no shape' becomes a reason for the permanency of non-existent things like sky, which appear to have happened to the sky, but failed to happen in the case of the atom supreme. When it is said that "The existent pot is happy", it does not conform to the reason ‘happy', which has no shape and is not relevant to the pot. So, the existent and non-existent are both applicable simultaneously in this case. How it is? Like the shapeless sky it is permanent, and like happiness it is impermanent. This kind of doubt arises. This is, therefore, called contributory side expansion.
...

In the quoted example, possibility and means both become deficient. ‘Sound is permanent nature for want of shape. Any other thing is of shapeless nature, but it is of permanent nature, like the pot.' If it said like this, in the pot example, the created possible permanent nature and the means which is shapeless are both appear to be not there.

(a-3(2) Ordinary contributory nature deficiency
The fake example of ordinary contributory nature deficiency is to show a thing which is not there. The possibility and means of showing for such a thing, they are, so to say, are deficient. "Sound is impermanent nature, for want of shape/ So any other shapeless nature thing is impermanent, like the sky"—if it is said like this, the example of sky possible nature impermanent and the means shapeless nature, both are like saying "There is no sky as such.' Since the statement doesn't match, it becomes deficient. If any one says, "Sky is there" this would appear as if it is permanent shapeless nature. For him also it will be with fault, as a contributory deficiency.
...