William Shakespeare

(26 April 1564 - 23 April 1616 / Warwickshire)

Sonnet 116: Let Me Not To The Marriage Of True Minds - Poem by William Shakespeare

Let me not to the marriage of true minds
Admit impediments. Love is not love
Which alters when it alteration finds,
Or bends with the remover to remove.
O no, it is an ever-fixèd mark
That looks on tempests and is never shaken;
It is the star to every wand'ring bark,
Whose worth's unknown, although his height be taken.
Love's not Time's fool, though rosy lips and cheeks
Within his bending sickle's compass come;
Love alters not with his brief hours and weeks,
But bears it out even to the edge of doom.
If this be error and upon me proved,
I never writ, nor no man ever loved.

Form: Sonnet


Comments about Sonnet 116: Let Me Not To The Marriage Of True Minds by William Shakespeare

  • Oladipo Daniel Akinnusi (6/1/2016 3:24:00 PM)


    Love is eternally made, it never fades, lost neither limited. Once a love is love then it is indeed love which last abs endures all till the end. (Report) Reply

    0 person liked.
    0 person did not like.
  • Fabrizio Frosini (1/17/2016 1:50:00 PM)


    Although in former times this sonnet was almost universally read as a paean to ideal and eternal love, with which all readers could easily identify, adding their own dream of perfection to what they found within it, modern criticism makes it possible to look beneath the idealism and to see some hints of a world which is perhaps slightly more disturbed than the poet pretends. In the first place it is important to see that the sonnet belongs in this place, sandwiched between three which discuss the philosophical question of how love deceives both eye and mind and judgement, and is then followed by four others which attempt to excuse the poet's own unfaithfulness and betrayal of the beloved. Set in such a context it does of course make it appear even more like a battered sea-mark which nevetheless rises above the waves of destruction, for it confronts all the vicissitudes that have afflicted the course of the love described in these sonnets, and declares that, in the final analysis, they are of no account.
    -
    (Report) Reply

  • Fabrizio Frosini (1/17/2016 1:47:00 PM)


    In addition, despite the idealism, there is an undercurrent of subversion which permeates all. It is ironic that a poem as famous as this should be seized on by the establishment as a declaration of their view of what love should be. Does the establishment view take account of the fact that this is a love poem written by a man to another man, and that the one impediment to their marriage is precisely that, for no church of the time, or scarcely even today, permits a man to marry a man? It is useless to object that Shakespeare is here talking of the marriage of true minds, for the language inevitably draws us to the Christain marriage service and its accompanying ceremonies, and that is a ceremony designed specifically to marry two people, not two abstract Platonic ideals which have decided to be wed. It is almost as if the exclamation 'Oh No! ' in the second quatrain is a recognition of this one great impediment that overhangs all others 'and all alone stands hugely politic'. (Report) Reply

  • Fabrizio Frosini (1/17/2016 1:16:00 PM)


    Of course it is partly due to the slow process of being drawn into the sonnets, with their continuous change and varying cycles of elation and depression, that the view is gradually inculcated into one's soul that this is a history of love which anyone might have known, a mortal and immortal love such as any two lovers in the tide of times might have experienced, or might even be experiencing now. We tend to forget that it is also an unconventional love, even more unconventional in the Elizabethan world than it is today. But it is precisely this unconventionality that gives to the sonnets their subversive tone, and it is that tone which forces us, not so much to be on the defensive, but to question more profoundly what we mean by the word love. What is that strange attraction which draws two minds so irresistibly together? Must we classify or restrict it? Does it depend on time, or place, on beliefs, on the sex of the lovers, on the Church, or politics, life, death, change, removal, doom, eternity, the day of judgement? Or on none of these? Is human love an allegory of divine love?
    Or should one prefer instead the all too human conclusion of W. H. Auden:
    ''I thought that love would last forever. I was wrong.''

    shakespeares-sonnets.com/
    (Report) Reply

  • (11/21/2015 11:40:00 AM)


    Typical Shakespeare love poem. (Report) Reply

  • (11/20/2015 1:32:00 AM)


    Shakespeare rocks me all the time...
    great sonnet!
    (Report) Reply

  • Rajnish Manga (2/14/2015 4:46:00 AM)


    It is a dazzling gem in the treasure trove of English poetry, courtesy William Shakespeare. And the following line of the sonnet is like a mantra for those in love: Love is not love / Which alters when it alteration finds, (Report) Reply

  • Reshma Joy (12/3/2014 4:28:00 AM)


    i loved this poem since the first time i read it! a beautiful definition of love is stated here.... (Report) Reply

  • Brian Jani (4/26/2014 5:33:00 AM)


    Awesome I like this poem, check mine out (Report) Reply

  • Fiona Schwartzinoff (12/19/2013 7:53:00 PM)


    I recite this almost everyday too! It reminds me of Marianne Dashwood and Willoughby from Sense and Sensibility. I love the way Kate Winslet recited this in the rain. How pitifully tragic. (Report) Reply

  • Declan Mehegan (11/29/2011 1:56:00 PM)


    Beautiful.I know this off by heart and recite this everyday. (Report) Reply

  • (6/16/2011 4:15:00 AM)


    It is the poem in which I melt myself. I cant find a definition for love which described already in this sonnet. (Report) Reply

  • (3/23/2010 5:33:00 PM)


    a great definition of love, this is my ultimate favorite poem ever. i adore william shakespeare. even at my young age. i have not completly understood this poem i do understand most of it. (Report) Reply

  • (9/19/2009 9:53:00 PM)


    Indeed, love is not time's fool! this sonnet simply puts to words the immortality of one true love (Report) Reply

  • (8/8/2009 2:11:00 PM)


    this is definitely my favourite out of all the Shakespeare Sonnets...and the last two lines are just magic! (Report) Reply

  • (7/13/2009 6:46:00 AM)


    this the first shakespeare work i've read...it is really lovely and timely.....i do love this poem...it's great.. (Report) Reply

  • (7/13/2009 6:42:00 AM)


    this the first shakespeare work i've read...it is really lovely and timely.....i do love this poem...it's great.. (Report) Reply

  • (1/6/2009 6:32:00 AM)


    This poem helped pave the way to my everlasting belief in true love. It is timeless and strips love down to its truest and most natural form. (Report) Reply

  • (12/15/2006 4:58:00 AM)


    Sonnet 116 has inspired me and comes to me sometimes when i am drunk or just lazily not thinking. Love is not love which alters when it alteration finds!
    brilliant. THis was the one that started me down this path of writing poems.
    (Report) Reply

  • (4/18/2005 2:27:00 PM)


    I love this poem. I cried the first time that I read it. To me, this is what love is about.
    If you liked this sonnet, you'd probably like the one that starts
    'No longer mourn for me when I am dead...'
    (Report) Reply

Read all 20 comments »




What do you think this poem is about?

Read poems about / on: marriage, star, love, time, sonnet



Poem Submitted: Monday, January 13, 2003



[Report Error]