Brian Dorn (7/28/2006 1:53:00 PM)
Man must learn to simply appreciate nature for what it is, we can not own it or control it... rather, it controls us. A brilliant perspective. |
Dr. Afaq Qureshi (4/19/2005 1:58:00 AM)
is it about the proprietary rights? the transition from 'house' to 'universe' and the defining period of time where the trees and air melt, and change to make the 'owner' realize about the inherent quality of change and stark reality of something more tangible, more permanent, the change itself. Can it be read in the perspective of human drama instead of mere imagery or wordplay. Maybe the person who wrote the lines didn't think of time but of timelessness. What then.. |
f k (3/29/2005 2:55:00 AM)
Son derece etkili, muhtesem bir siir.
Senelerce senelerce evveldi
Bir deniz ulkesinde
Yasayan bir kiz vardi bileceksiniz
İ smi; Annabel Lee
tesekkurler... |
Erica Lucero (2/24/2005 8:26:00 PM)
This is a beautiful poem about nature. The main theme of this poem is natures ownership. The first stanza talks about natures beauty and that humans own all of it. The second stanza changes all of this. Margaret Atwood uses personification and imagery to convey natures rejection to the fact that humans own nature. In the third stanza nature restates that humans indeed do not own nature and that humans belong to nature. Instead of the other way around. Natures ownership is a good question. I agree that nature owns us because why else must we return to the ground when we die? |
