|
|
 |
|
|
User Rating: |
|
9.6
/10
(136
votes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The art of losing isn't hard to master;
so many things seem filled with the intent
to be lost that their loss is no disaster,
Lose something every day. Accept the fluster
of lost door keys, the hour badly spent.
The art of losing isn't hard to master.
Then practice losing farther, losing faster:
places, and names, and where it was you meant
to travel. None of these will bring disaster.
I lost my mother's watch. And look! my last, or
next-to-last, of three beloved houses went.
The art of losing isn't hard to master.
I lost two cities, lovely ones. And, vaster,
some realms I owned, two rivers, a continent.
I miss them, but it wasn't a disaster.
-- Even losing you (the joking voice, a gesture
I love) I shan't have lied. It's evident
the art of losing's not too hard to master
though it may look like (Write it!) a disaster.
Elizabeth Bishop
|
|
Read poems about / on: lost, travel, loss, mother, city, river
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Comments about this poem (One Art
by
Elizabeth Bishop
) |
|
Click here to write your
comments about this poem (One Art by
Elizabeth Bishop
)
 |
Emily S
(2/19/2009 9:19:00 PM) |
I'm doing a project for school about Elizabeth Bishop (specifically this poem) and I had to disagree with what most people have said. Has anyone actually researched her life? You might know that Bishop was a lesbian, and her partners could have been both friends and lovers. And why would you think a lover wouldn't have a lasting effect on her? This poem (actually the last stanza) lines up with her life and makes more sense if you look at it in that context.
|
|
|
|
Alexandra Burt
(12/18/2008 6:24:00 AM) |
I think she's talking about a friend in the last stanza because she's trying to sound more indifferent, although where she says (Write it!) its evident that losing that person really is a disaster since she has to push herself to write the last two words. It seems that the person she's losing will have a long-term effect on her and that she knows the person very well by the (the joking voice, a gesture I love) . If it was a lover, it wouldn't sound like losing that person would have a lasting effect on her. She would have been able to get over losing a lover fairly quickly, but it takes longer to get over losing a good friend.
|
|
|
|
Kanchi Baral
(12/5/2008 1:39:00 PM) |
Why do you guys think that she loses a friend not the lover for the last stanza?
|
|
|
|
Jacob Lowey
(10/29/2008 9:36:00 PM) |
This poem is so good with its somewhat ironic subject. Not many people consider losing an 'art' Elizabeth Bishop shows how she does not truly believe that losing 'isn't hard to master' with various gives, some of the more obvious ones including the '(Write it!) ' and the slant rhymes at the end of lines 4 and 16. Also, the fact that there is one more disaster than master (if you count them) unbalances the structure, and shows that losing that someone, be it lover or friend, was truly a disaster that she has yet to master.
Sorry for analyzing a bit too much, I'm doing this for practice =P
|
|
|
|
Nina .a.
(10/16/2008 3:27:00 PM) |
I just adore this poem its amazing capturing and fulfiling :) she's my new idol and i dont even know anything about her hehe
|
|
|
|
Alice Heggie
(4/27/2008 4:38:00 PM) |
Amy Hayden... do not quote from films when critiquing a poem. Specifically in this case from 'In Her Shoes'.
It's not doing you any favours.
|
|
|
|
Amy Hayden
(4/21/2008 12:33:00 AM) |
I most deffinately have to agree with Rashad, the poem is about loosing love, but not the love of a lover. At first she talks about loosing real things like keys and a watch, but then she talks about loosing things such as a continent, she's getting grandiose, Bishop is trying to make it seam like it doesnt matter, her tone is detached, she wants to sound detached becuse she knows deep down how bad it's going to feel to loose. but it isnt a lover that she's loosing it's a friend, friendship. I absolutely love this poem! ! ! ! !
|
|
|
|
Cynthia Brown
(10/7/2007 6:50:00 PM) |
The author tries very hard to detach herself from her pain – a pain so horrible in the end, it is compared constantly to “disaster”; albeit, through barely discernable and subtle skepticism. In shrugging off her losses, she attempts to justify what she hopes will bring her peace – taking loss to an art form. This inhuman feat can never be successfully accomplished – among mere mortals anyway. “Even losing you, ” she says, is obviously the most unbearable of losses – so much so she cannot even she cannot bring herself to write the word and so it is through parenthetic pause (Write it) she once again feels the gravity of her loss – again the word “disaster”.
Note also that in the first three stanzas she repeats:
The art of losing is not hard to master.
When it comes to losing the friend or lover that statement becomes:
The art of losing is not too hard to master.
To me, this puts the reader on notice that if it we were to simply remove the word “not”, the true meaning of the poem is revealed. When one tries to hard to convince me of something, they are usually fooling themselves.
|
|
|
|
A.a. Flow
(5/11/2007 11:51:00 PM) |
One of her greatest and most influential poems. The last line's parenthetic exclamation redeems the ironic stance on loss (as if the art of losing was easy to master) . It says, with a lump in the throat, but full resolve, 'get on with your life! '
Two other great poems: The Moose, The Fish
|
|
Read all
16
comments >>
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
People who read
Elizabeth Bishop
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
