|
Comments about this poem (1(a... (a leaf falls on loneliness)
by
e.e. cummings
) |
|
Click here to write your
comments about this poem (1(a... (a leaf falls on loneliness) by
e.e. cummings
)
 |
Martin Springer
(10/11/2007 8:19:00 AM) |
'a leaf falls' is embedded within loneliness; it interrupts loneliness. I imagine a person being lonely and confused, just as we are by the typographical dislocation of the words; yet as we process the poem, we make sense out of it, just as the lonely person might make sense of experience, converting what begins as 'loneliness' into 'oneliness'. A lonely person has separated him/herself from others, has perhaps been morose, but before it can become despair, he/she sees a leaf fall and an epiphany occurs about the subject's at-one-ness with creation.
|
|
|
|
A Bunt
(2/7/2007 11:43:00 PM) |
Hmmm, at first I didn't think so, but upon reflection, I do believe both Michael Toland and Bobby Lankin to be correct: that the first line is 'l(a' (letter 'L') , and that it is IN rather than ON.
Look: l(a leaf falls) onliness
the parenthetical '(a leaf falls) ' is embedded IN the word 'l...oneliness'
(loneliness/Loneliness, not 1liness)
Plus, semantically, it makes more sense to say 'a leaf falls in loneliness' rather than the 'on' version. Think of it this way: 'in loneliness, a leaf falls' makes more sense than 'on loneliness, a leaf falls', don't you agree?
AND, I agree with Michael Toland that including 'a leaf falls' in the 'false title' ruins it for the first time reader- it's like including the punch line at the beginning of a joke.
|
|
|
|
Sal Paradise
(1/27/2007 12:15:00 PM) |
The typewriter idea might be correct, I'm not sure, but the poem couldn't have been written in the mid 1800s considering e. e. wasn't born yet. It was first published in 1958 in his '95 poems' (some sources also state it was published in 'Tulips and Chimneys' in 1923, but it's nowhere to be found in the index of that book) . As for the title of the poem, it's the font that is the issue. The number 1 works here rather than using the letter 'l', because this fonts 'l' does not have the curve at the top, and the poem is normally titled '1(a'.
|
|
|
|
Katherine Cherry
(1/15/2007 6:09:00 PM) |
The title is actually correct... this poem is written in the mid 1800's, they didnt have computers so they used a typewriter. The letter 'L' and the number 1 were the same key on the typewriter...so the title '1(a' is correct. if it was really the letter L the poem wouldn't make sense... the number one symbolizes loneliness, that is why it is the number 1. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
Sara Henderson
(9/16/2006 9:32:00 PM) |
Um okay I don't think you can really say that there is supposed to be any specific preposition in the non-existent title of this poem there Bobby Lankin. If e.e. cummings intended a preposition he would have used one. But he didn't. He used parentheses. Also the 1/L mixup really really screws up the entire poem. Let's get it straight poemhunter, come on.
|
|
|
|
Bobby Lankin
(5/11/2006 5:21:00 PM) |
It seems that people think this poem is supposed to have a name. It is not. Also, if it were supposed to have a name, its name would be 'A leaf falls IN loneliness' not ON loneliness. If you understood the true meaning of this poem, you would understand that.
|
|
|
|
Michael Toland
(4/27/2006 11:39:00 PM) |
the title is 'l(a' not '1(a... (a leaf falls on loneliness) '. this false title ruins the poem for first-time readers.
|
|
Read all
7
comments >>
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
People who read
e.e. cummings
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
