Diatribe Descrying All Guru's [revised] Poem by Margaret Alice Second

This author skeptic passionately rejected Demartini's
breakthrough experience - it did not change a thing
for him when he attended a seminar at great cost -
then he claimed there was no help for anyone there
while ignoring evidence that other people attend
with great joy

After his dramatic on site diatribe descrying all self-
help guru's, the author changes and sweetly invites us
read his own text on mental & money problems and how to
solve them; now my question is: If, when ALL his prede-
cessors and contemporaries are avowed frauds, then how
is it only HE is to be believed

Objections he leveled against them apply equally to HIM
because of why he finds them untrue, ‘they did not work
for him' is just as true for me - it makes me laugh; the
sudden change in tone, cajoling, inviting readers to read
more of the same tripe based on one person's experience

And it is always wrong to put faith in claims made by a
stranger that cannot be proved objectively, it is funny he
expects readers whom he armoured against this kind of
claim to accept him on the same shaky basis - his own
research and revelations;

As these authors ridicule and reject each other it is easier
to read them for fun, enlarging the scope of imagination -
while we make up our minds on the basis of personal
experience only



[ORIGIN: ]

With great passion the skeptic author rejected
Demartini's breakthrough experience as it did
not change anything for him when he attended
a seminar at great cost - then the author claims
there is no help for anyone in there, in the face
of the evidence that other people attend with
great joy

At the end of his dramatic diatribe descrying all
self-help guru's in sight, the author changes and
sweetly invites all to read his own text on mental
and money problems and how to solve them, and
my question is: While ALL his predecessors and
contemporaries are called frauds, why is only HE
to be believed

All the objections he leveled against them applies
to HIM also because the reason why he finds them
untrue - they do not work for him - is just as true
for me - he made me laugh; the sudden change in
tone, the cajoling, inviting the reader to read more
of the same kind of material based on one person's
experience after

Telling the reader why it is always wrong to put faith
in a stranger making claims that cannot be proved
objectively - it is funny that he expects the reader
whom he has provided with armour against this kind
of claim, to accept him on this shaky basis - namely
his own research and revelations; as these authors
ridicule and reject each other

It is easier to read them just for fun, enlarging the
scope of the imagination - while we make up our
minds on the basis of personal experience only