A prototype of learning standard is the cap.
The gauge with which the status of every student is measured.
The difference in fitness is the best way to snap
Slow learners against fast learners in no cacophonous pressure.
How can lapses be detected if the cap is not sampled
On all heads to warrant how to handle the rigour?
Even though all fingers are not equal,
They live together to form palm figure.
Thumb is not the tallest yet its grip hooks steering wheel tight.
Denial of which is a death-trap in automobile crash - right?
Every entity is not a nonentity in its right position.
I have seen a dullard - More expressive and brilliant in his peer's teaching devotion.
Learning is incomplete by separation.
We learn by, with and from each other's cognition.
How can phobia of facing crowd be conquered,
If no chance of such environment is uncovered?
My prosecutor claimed that all fingers are not equal.
Can inequality hamper the functionality of every finger?
What difference can be made if one cap fits not all or rubber-banded cap fits all?
You seem not to understand my pointer through the radar.
The size of head is not a determining factor but size of uncontrolled cap.
Problems cannot be solved if not identified in their gaps.
Useless is the non-channelled running tap.
Teaching is fruitless if not directed at the problems snapped.